Article Evaluation Process
Articles that align with the journal's editorial policy undergo a double-blind peer review process, meaning they are anonymously submitted to two or three external reviewers. They are also reviewed by the editorial board. Accepted articles are subject to any changes in style or clarifications to the content requested by these reviewers.
The members of the review board complete a feedback form, taking into account both content and style.
Feedback is provided to the authors by the editorial board members responsible for coordinating the issue to which the article is intended, who then verify that the changes made to the text correspond to the reviewers' requests. The article review process can take up to six months.
The reading committee is composed of experienced practitioners and academics:
- Katia Brasil Tarouquella (Brazil)
- Roxane Dejours (France)
- Caroline Demeule (France)
- Catherine Desprats-Péquignot (France)
- Catherine Dupuis. (France)
- Sylvie Ferry (France)
- Eric Hamraoui (France)
- Tevfika Ikiz T. (Türkiye)
- Mélanie Jacquot M. (France)
- Pedro Macedo (Portugal)
- Francis Martens (Belgium)
- Suzanne Pestureau S (France)
- Raphaëlle Pérétié (France)
- Antoine Petit (France)
- Magali Ravit (France)
- Robert Samacher (France)
- Régine Scelles R. (France)
- Anne Tassel (France)
- Hélène Tessier H. (Canada)
- Sandra Thetio (France)
- Monique Zerbib (France)
- Zingg M. (France)
- Sylvia Zornig (Brazil)